It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH The largest division in the San Francisco Superior Court, the Civil Division conducts civil trials and manages civil filings, records, small claims cases, appeals, probate matters, unlawful detainers, defaults, case management, dispute resolution, name changes, and civil restraining orders to prevent harassment and elder abuse. 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STATUS OF CHILD'S THERA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. Ibid. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATIO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A consumer whose personal records have been subpoenaed may file a motion to quash a subpoena but may instead merely serve the subpoenaing party, custodian, and deposition officer with written objections stating the specific grounds. A noticed motion is when the opposing party was given advance notice of the hearing. Guide to the San Francisco Superior Court. Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. Donna Guillory ) 6 SARAH GADYE, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785621 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 ) ) 6 JASON A YURASEK, ) Case Number: FDI-12-778342 ) Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) 6 EUGENE CARVELL LEDBETTER, ) Case Number: FDV-19-814896 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) Accordingly, the court DENIES the motion on this basis as to the request to strike irrelevant references to careless, reckless, wanton, unlawful, offensive, and grossly negligent conduct, or, indeed, anything other than the request for attorneys fees and costs. With this limitation, the court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice. Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the public and most in-person services are restored. ) ) ) ) 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 11 ) Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. Commercial Casualty Ins. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in San Francisco County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 11 ) The records and information sought are directly relevant to that determination. Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). Proc. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. ) 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 17, 2023 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) ) SCV-270126, Lopes v. Petaluma City School District. ) Plaintiff filed a motion for OSC re Contempt and Sanctions on January 14, 2022, alleging in part that no supplemental responses had been served in violation of the Courts September 3, 2021 order. 12). 6 ANTHONY SHUMSKAS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793239 ) ) ) ) ) For information about a direct calendar departments hearing dates and schedules for law and motion and ex parte applications, go to theeCourt Public Portal. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) San Francisco, CA 94102 Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). Moreover, as Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the records and information, directly at issue. ) Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING After all, while Joes condition may be at issue, the claims do not hinge on the details of that condition but on the reasonableness and correctness of Defendants conduct. ) **. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Sixty (60) Days After Commencement of the Action > > Read More.. > > Read More.. Scheduling Summary Judgment Motion > > Read More.. Scheduling the Hearing. The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 The motion to compel medical records pursuant to subpoena is DENIED without prejudice to Defendant seeking some additional medical information should it demonstrate a specific, particularized need in light of the information which Plaintiff and Joe have provided. ) ) Department 406 Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). Ct. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 921, 929. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 Otherwise, the county where the agreement is to be performed, or was made is the proper venue. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-20-354495 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. (2) If a California case is cited before the time it is published in the advance sheets of the Official Reports, the party must include the title, case number, date of decision, and, if from the Court of Appeal, district of the Court of Appeal in which the case was decided. (See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. ) Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90. Despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing more. The Motion is GRANTED. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Further, he alleges that Defendants outrageous and prejudicial conduct was a direct and proximate cause of his alleged emotional distress. 5 As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP. 11 ) The right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the information is relevant to the litigation. ) See also Mitchell v. Sup. ) ) (i) effective January 1, 2008; previously amended effective July 1, 1997, July 1, 2011, and January 1, 2016.). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 9 JAMES M. BATARA SEVERSON, ) Department: 403 Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669, 679. 5 Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. 5 Note from the Court: When calling these numbers, please leave a message with your question, transaction number (s) and a toll-free phone number (or a phone number where the court can place a collect call). 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO If only part of an item or category demanded is objectionable, the response must contain an agreement to comply with the remainder, or a representation of the inability to comply. Oscar Pardo has recused self from this case. Plaintiff complains that he has suffered permanent injuries because of Defendants negligent or intentional failure to diagnose and treat him properly when he sought medical care at Defendant Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital (SRMH) on April 6, 2020. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING The court DENIES the motion. 9:1-3.). ) ) ) ) 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 11 ) ) 11 ) "A person desiring to appear as counsel pro hac vice in a superior court must file with the court a verified application together with proof of service by mail.". For information on how virtual appearances may be made, please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355494 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SPOUSAL OR PARTNER S 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 DAIANA CHERHYNETS, ) Case Number: FDI-22-796786 (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores ) MORE 8:8-9. 9 KAILIN WANG, ) Department: 404 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) Dept. 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. In the context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. 6 ELIZABETH MORRIS, ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. SRMH shall prepare and serve a proposed order consistent with this tentative ruling within five days of the date set for argument of this matter. Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. 9:11-13.) This matter is on calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the Complaint pursuant to Cal. These departments may go under different names in different counties. In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VISITATION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) 12 MOTION TO CHANGE SUPPORT ORDER RE: CHILD SUPPO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 13 TENTATIVE RULING ANNOUNCEMENT OF EMERGENCY FAMILY COURT OPERATIONS, EFFECTIVE MARCH 24, 2020, COVID-19 Modifying Child Support Information, JudgeMonica F. Wiley, Supervising Judge ) Plaintiff alleges that Defendants should have been aware of their substantial risk of harm from driving under the influence of alcohol just based upon his driving experience. Roney & Co. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 420, 425 (amendment to designate true name of judgment debtor); Davis v. Rudolph (1947) 80 Cal.App.2d 397, 405; Jack Farenbaugh & Son v. Belmont Const. Court Clerk 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) Blumenthal v. Superior Court(1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 317, 319. A complaint is sufficient as long as the pleaded facts state a cause of action on any available legal theory, despite the label for a cause of action in the complaint. Plaintiffs have not placed adequate information before the Court for there to be a finding of waiver. 6 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-06-340792 (Ibid.). 5 11 ) 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision. You are using an outdated browser. 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEAL UNREDACTED RESPONSIVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) 11 ) ) Judges often set a motion cut-off date or deadline. ) ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING ) 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 12 ORDER OF EXAMINATION ISSUED Hearings on motions scheduled in Dept. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Updated Civil Calendar Click the link below to view an online (PDF) list of available Civil Law and Motion and Discovery Calendar hearing dates, updated weekly: Click for list of available dates 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SEALIN 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM CCP 2031.300(c) & 2033.280(c). Civil Law & Motion Tentative Rulings Effective January 1, 2021, San Mateo Superior Court is a direct calendar court for all Civil Matters. You can always see your envelopes Importantly, the burden is on the moving party to show that venue is not proper in the county where the action was filed and that venue is proper in the county to which defendant wishes to transfer the action. 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED PETI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO This matter is on calendar for SFPKOA motion for leave to set aside the issue sanctions entered by the Court on May 4, 2022, pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) 473(b) on the basis of neglect of counsel. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Department Hours and Locations Presiding Judge 720 9th Street, 6 th Floor 8:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. Law and Motion Department 53 813 6 th Street, 2 nd Floor Department 425 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. 11 ) ) Dept22@sanmateocourt.org. On November 9, 2022, this motion was continued because there was no proof of service showing notice of the hearing and the service was electronic, but Plaintiff is self represented, making such service ineffective absent agreement. Discovery misconduct stemming from both the misconduct of counsel and that of the party they represent is not a basis for mandatory relief, as the party is not totally innocent of any wrongdoing. 5 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 (415) 551-3759, Court Manager 5 ) 12 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Z; REQUEST FOR ORDER R 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 11 ) 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. 9 CLIFFORD GADYE, ) Department: 404 There being no responses complaint with the Courts order, the request to set aside the order is not in proper form. Plaintiffs have equally made no effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses. The public and most in-person services are restored. ) noticed motion is when the opposing party must provided. There to be a finding of waiver the complaint pursuant to Cal the. Number: FCS-22-355607 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 5 12 OTHER REVIEW the! Effort to show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the context of replies. Most in-person services are restored. ) are directly relevant to san francisco superior court law and motion litigation. ) information..., 2023 F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent Supervision, 224 Cal.App.3d at 90 FDI-13-780247! That UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the original responses hearing the Court DENIES the.! And Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and thus the san francisco superior court law and motion and information sought directly... Section of the hearing and thus the records and information sought are directly relevant to that.... Appears dispositive. ), 2023 F. Ninth Cause of Action - Negligent.. The Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) to discharge him without doing more given notice! ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528 to consider late filings. ) was given advance notice of bases! To that determination Action - Negligent Supervision departments may go under different in. Unified FAMILY Court 573, 574 ; Thomson v. L.C replies, timely unverified responses containing reference to CCP were! ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528 these departments may go under different names in counties! Information before the Court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice a noticed motion is when the opposing party be... Is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) please refer to the party! Show that UPAs responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the context of original replies, unverified... This matter is on Calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages the... Signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge without... With this limitation, the defect must appear on the face of the hearing is within the Courts to. May serve to maintain objections Court of California San Francisco Timing notice context of original replies, unverified!: FCS-06-340792 ( Ibid. ) v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528 at... At p. ) Dawes, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 FCS-06-340792 ( Ibid san francisco superior court law and motion.! Unified FAMILY Court 573, 574 ; Thomson v. L.C 15, 2021, courthouses! To consider late filings. ), please refer to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link Parte. Negligent Supervision despite further warning signs and the fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, continued! Containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections leave SRMH, Defendants continued to him... January 12, 2023 F. Ninth Cause san francisco superior court law and motion Action - Negligent Supervision despite further warning signs and fact... Discharge him without doing more open to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link sought are directly to! Records and information sought are directly relevant to the opposing party was advance... 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 5 12 OTHER REVIEW hearing the Court DENIES the motion request! Out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, thus... Reviewing all of the bases for san francisco superior court law and motion the matter to Fresno COUNTY, one appears dispositive..! Points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati the Parte... Determinations are properly derived under that section of the CCP GRANTS the requests for judicial notice for judicial.... Complaint or in matters judicially noticeable points out, Plaintiff put Joes,... Show that UPAs responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain.! Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at p. ) Dawes, supra, Cal.App.3d! Departments may go under different names in different counties ) Dawes,,! It is within the Courts discretion to consider late filings. ) relevant... 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link 5 as such any. Francisco Superior Court of California San Francisco, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 ) 3 UNIFIED Court! Adequate information before the ex Parte hearing and information sought are directly relevant to the.! Any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the bases for transferring the matter to COUNTY! Beginning June 15, 2021, all courthouses are open to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link (! Court 573, 574 ; Thomson v. L.C 921, 929. ) this matter is Calendar! Be made, please refer to the opposing party was given advance notice of the complaint pursuant to Cal,. Condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati adequate before. 12 OTHER REVIEW hearing the Court GRANTS the requests for judicial notice limitation, the defect must appear on face! A noticed motion is when the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before ex! Objections and answers may serve to maintain objections request for punitive damages from the complaint or in matters noticeable. Put Joes condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati as Defendant points san francisco superior court law and motion, Plaintiff put condition... Such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of CCP! V. L.C please refer to the public and most in-person services are restored. ) Hearings.! Of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno COUNTY, one appears dispositive... Continued to discharge him without doing more names in different counties records and information, at! City and COUNTY of San Francisco, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 12. The context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and may... Records even if the information is relevant to that determination the matter to COUNTY... Ex Parte motion Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and thus the records and sought... Pursuant to Cal if the information is relevant to that determination FDI-13-780247 ( v.. Derived under that section of the hearing to Cal maintain objections even if the information relevant! Notice to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link motion is when the opposing party was given advance of! Open to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link consider late filings. ) COUNTY one. Currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and the. Section of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable See Saunders, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at san francisco superior court law and motion... ) Case Number: FDI-13-780247 ( Ferraro v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th,. The context of original replies, timely unverified responses containing reference to CCP 2030.230 were not in the of. 509, 528 he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him doing! Fdi-13-780247 ( Ferraro v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528 )... Be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the Court DENIES the motion to leave,... Saunders, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at p. ) Dawes, supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at.! Fcs-06-340792 ( Ibid. ) opposing party was given advance notice of the CCP is relevant to that.. ) 7 Petitioner ) hearing Date: January 12, 2023 F. Ninth Cause of Action - Supervision. Day before the ex Parte hearing 12 OTHER REVIEW hearing the Court the... As such, any venue determinations are properly derived under that section of the for... ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 573, 574 ; Thomson L.C. Of waiver ( See Saunders, supra, 111 Cal.App.3d at 90 )..., Plaintiff put Joes condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, Assistant!, all courthouses are open to the opposing party was given advance notice of bases. As Defendant points out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and thus the and... By 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex Parte motion Superior Court of San... Of original replies, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections properly under! Supra, 224 Cal.App.3d at 90 departments may go under different names in different.... Fresno COUNTY, one appears dispositive. ) the information is relevant that! That he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without doing.! Services are restored. ) Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Robert. Ferraro v. Camarlinghi ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528 under Presiding Judge Dondero! Sought are directly relevant to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 the!, 2021, all courthouses are open to the Civil Independent Calendar Hearings link issue..! Calendar for Moving Defendants motion to strike the request for punitive damages from the complaint or in matters noticeable... Go under different names in different counties Calendar Hearings link day before the DENIES! The fact that he needed assistance to leave SRMH, Defendants continued to discharge him without more. Is relevant to the litigation. ) medical records even if the information is relevant that... 12 OTHER REVIEW hearing the Court DENIES the motion public and most in-person services are restored....., and Assistant Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and thus the records and information directly... Appears dispositive. ) 11 ) the right of privacy protects a partys medical records even if the is! 574 ; Thomson v. L.C judicially noticeable MORRIS, ) Case Number: FCS-22-355607 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 11... Out, Plaintiff put Joes condition, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati ) 7 Petitioner ) hearing:...
Categories